Guidance. Clarity. Direction.

Carter, DeLuca & Farrell LLP, a leader in intellectual property law, provides cost-effective services to clients from around the world, protecting innovations in a wide range of technologies.

Throughout the phases of product or brand development, we form a critical part of our clients’ development teams to provide preparation, prosecution and clearance services to maximize protection while navigating through freedom-to-operate challenges. We also provide extensive IP due diligence services and IP asset assimilation to help our clients achieve their business objectives.

Search Attorneys

Mini Attorneys Search

Professional Name:

Practice Areas:

Events

Check back for future events

CAFC Update

TREEHOUSE AVATAR LLC v. VALVE CORPORATION November 30, 2022

Treehouse owns U.S. Patent 8,180,858, which discloses a method of collecting data from an information network in response to user choices of a plurality of users navigating character-enabled network sites on the network. Treehouse sued Valve for infringement of the ’858 Patent with infringement based on the operation of the accused video games. The...

Treehouse owns U.S. Patent 8,180,858, which discloses a method of collecting data from an information network in response to user...

UNILOC USA, INC. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC November 4, 2022

Uniloc sued Motorola for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,161,134 which district court dismissed because Uniloc had granted a license and the existence of the license deprived Uniloc of standing. In a related case, Uniloc sued Blackboard Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,324,578 and 7,069,293 but the district court dismissed applying the...

Uniloc sued Motorola for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,161,134 which district court dismissed because Uniloc had granted a license...

ABC CORPORATION I v. PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS October 28, 2022

Plaintiffs own four design patents on hoverboards. Plaintiffs brought suit against appellants (who sell Gyroor-branded hoverboards) claiming that products sold by appellants infringed plaintiffs’ patents. The district court entered a TRO, followed by a preliminary injunction. On appeal, the issue is whether the preliminary injunction must be set aside because the district court erred...

Plaintiffs own four design patents on hoverboards. Plaintiffs brought suit against appellants (who sell Gyroor-branded hoverboards) claiming that products sold...