Guidance. Clarity. Direction.

Carter, DeLuca & Farrell LLP, a leader in intellectual property law, provides cost-effective services to clients from around the world, protecting innovations in a wide range of technologies.

Throughout the phases of product or brand development, we form a critical part of our clients’ development teams to provide preparation, prosecution and clearance services to maximize protection while navigating through freedom-to-operate challenges. We also provide extensive IP due diligence services and IP asset assimilation to help our clients achieve their business objectives.

Search Attorneys

Events

May
22 – 23
2019
21st Future of Health Technology Summit at MIT Attending SponsoringGeorge Likourezos, partner, will present on the panel Future IP and Legal Issues in AI-driven Drug Development at the 21st Future of...

CAFC Update

TEK GLOBAL, S.R.L. v. SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL March 29, 2019

Following a jury trial finding Sealant Systems liable to TEK for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,789,110 directed to an emergency kit for repairing vehicle tires deflated by puncture, SSI appeals several pre- and post-judgment orders from the District Court. Specifically, SSI appeals the district court’s claim construction order and its orders denying SSI’s motions for a...

Following a jury trial finding Sealant Systems liable to TEK for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,789,110 directed to an emergency kit for...

ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. March 28, 2019

Endo appeals the district court’s decision holding the claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,808,737 relating to methods of using oxymorphone to treat pain in patients with impaired kidney function in-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The CAFC finds that the claims are eligible because they are directed to a specific method of treatment for specific patients...

Endo appeals the district court’s decision holding the claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,808,737 relating to methods of using oxymorphone to treat pain...

CHARGEPOINT, INC. v. SEMACONNECT, INC.

ChargePoint appeals the decision of the District Court, which that the eight patent claims asserted by ChargePoint relating to charging stations for electric vehicles that are connected to a network were ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. First, the CAFC finds that, looking at the problem identified in the patent, as well as...

ChargePoint appeals the decision of the District Court, which that the eight patent claims asserted by ChargePoint relating to charging stations...