Guidance. Clarity. Direction.

Carter, DeLuca & Farrell LLP, a leader in intellectual property law, provides cost-effective services to clients from around the world, protecting innovations in a wide range of technologies.

Throughout the phases of product or brand development, we form a critical part of our clients’ development teams to provide preparation, prosecution and clearance services to maximize protection while navigating through freedom-to-operate challenges. We also provide extensive IP due diligence services and IP asset assimilation to help our clients achieve their business objectives.

Search Attorneys

Events

Sep
19 – 22
2019
27th IAKL Annual Conference AttendingCarter DeLuca Partner Chul-Woo Lee will be attending the 27th Annual International Association of Korean Lawyers (IAKL) Conference from September 19, 2019...

CAFC Update

GENETIC VETERINARY SCIENCES v. LABOKLIN GMBH & CO. KG August 9, 2019

Genetic Veterinary Sciences sued the University of Bern and LABOKLIN (the University’s exclusive licensee) seeking a declaratory judgment that claims of the University’s U.S. Patent No. 9,157,114 (relating to relates to in vitro methods for genotyping Labrador Retrievers, in order to discover whether the dog might be a genetic carrier of the disease Hereditary Nasal Parakeratosis...

Genetic Veterinary Sciences sued the University of Bern and LABOKLIN (the University’s exclusive licensee) seeking a declaratory judgment that claims of the...

ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. August 6, 2019

ATEN appeals the District Court’s denial of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”), which declined to overturn the jury’s findings that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,589,141 (relating to technology for switching between computers that share a keyboard, monitor, and mouse through a KVM switch, such as a keyboard shortcut) are invalid as anticipated...

ATEN appeals the District Court’s denial of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”), which declined to overturn the jury’s findings that the...

ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Uniclass and others appeal the District Court’s order denying their motion for attorney fees. Appellants argue that the district court erred in not finding this case exceptional based on ATEN’s disregard for the “foundational policy” of proportionate litigation. The CAFC notes, however, that there is no per se rule that a case is exceptional if litigation costs...

Uniclass and others appeal the District Court’s order denying their motion for attorney fees. Appellants argue that the district court erred in...